Loading

The Biggest Waste in Manufacturing Isn’t Material—It’s Potential

The Transformation Printing Ignored for Twenty Years

Introduction.

Twenty years ago, I stood on VistaPrint's production floor in Windsor and watched something extraordinary unfold. We were running 30-40 production cycles per press per shift on offset equipment—ten times the industry standard. Our digital presses operate with zero waste. We had real-time performance data at every operator's fingertips. Four organizational layers, from operator to CEO, meant decisions happened fast and improvements spread faster.

It wasn't magic. It was what becomes possible when you combine good technology with great people and give both the respect they deserve.

Here's what troubles me: That was 2005. The tools we use now are better, cheaper, and more accessible. Yet many printing and packaging operations today still run on processes from the 1960s, 70s, and 80s. Not because the technology isn't available—it absolutely is—but because we've been afraid to challenge how things have always been done.

What I've Learned in 35+ Years

I've trained over 500+ press operators across three continents. I've commissioned Komori, Heidelberg, and Manroland presses, implemented Lean strategies at multiple facilities, and moved back and forth between consulting offices and production floors. And here's the truth I keep coming back to:

Your equipment is not your competitive advantage. Your people are.

Every company can buy the same presses, the same software, the same automation systems. What separates the leaders from the followers is how well people use those tools. How quickly they solve problems. How effectively they adapt when conditions change.

The ROI You're Not Tracking.

Companies investing just 3-5% of payroll in workforce development see a $2-3 return on every dollar invested within 2 years. Organizations that pair technology investments with systematic training get 40% more value from their equipment spending. Operations with transparent, real-time data systems report 15-30% better equipment effectiveness.

These aren't projections—they're measured results from real facilities.

Yet most organizations still treat training as the first thing to cut when budgets tighten. We'll spend a couple of million dollars on a new press without hesitation, but we'll debate whether we can afford $50,000 in operator training. It doesn't make sense, but it's what we do.

The People We're Missing

I've worked with extraordinary talent in unexpected places. Brandi, a skilled millwright maintaining complex packaging equipment. Kevin, a press operator who consistently achieved make-ready times that seemed impossible—not through superhuman speed but through systematic technique and the visibility to refine his approach.

Manufacturing has traditionally operated with rigid assumptions about who belongs on the floor and what roles they can perform. These assumptions aren't just ethically wrong—they're economically wasteful. We're excluding capable people based on demographics rather than demonstrated ability, and then we wonder why we have workforce shortages.

The printing industry is graying. Baby Boomers are retiring, taking decades of knowledge with them. Generation Z expects transparency, purpose, and rapid advancement. Women are increasingly represented in manufacturing, challenging cultures built on homogeneous hierarchies. The workforce is changing whether we're ready or not.

Organizations that create inclusive environments—where contribution matters more than conformity, where advancement is based on skill rather than tenure, where knowledge is shared systematically rather than hoarded—will have access to talent that their competitors overlook.

The Data We're Wasting

Here's something Taiichi Ohno couldn't have anticipated when he developed Lean manufacturing: the ninth waste—unrealized data.

Your equipment is generating vast streams of information: cycle times, error rates, material consumption, and quality metrics. Most of that data sits in databases that operators never see. It gets turned into management reports that arrive too late to prevent problems. Workers who could act on insights don't have access to the information they need.

This is waste as real as material sitting in inventory or defects rolling off the line. Except it's harder to see and easier to ignore.

Manufacturing Execution Systems like SpencerMetrics CONNECT® exist specifically to solve this problem—putting real-time performance visibility directly in front of the people who can act on it. When operators can see their performance as it happens, identify inefficiencies immediately, and adjust processes in real time, the whole operation transforms.

But here's the critical piece: the technology only works if you implement it as an enablement tool, not a surveillance tool. Give people information to help them succeed, not data to catch them failing. That philosophical difference determines everything.

What VistaPrint Taught Me

VistaPrint's breakthrough wasn't about equipment—it was about systems thinking. Integrated digital workflows. Predictable e-commerce demand. Dual-platform optimization between offset and digital. Flat organizational structures that distribute authority instead of concentrating it.

And most importantly: persuasion-based management. Not pushing people harder through pressure and overtime, but developing capability through engagement, transparency, and trust.

The company went public, evolved into Cimpress, and now has a market cap exceeding $2 billion. The transformation validated that these principles work at scale.

But here's the uncomfortable truth: VistaPrint kept this breakthrough relatively quiet. The 2005 Print Industries of America convention in Detroit? The directors chose not to showcase the Windsor facility. Perhaps they worried about competitive advantage. Perhaps they were concerned about upsetting industry norms.

Twenty years later, much of the industry still operates as if VistaPrint's innovations never happened. The tools are available. The techniques are proven. The ROI is documented. Yet we're collectively choosing to compete with one hand tied behind our backs.

What Becomes Possible

Imagine your operation where:

  • Every operator sees their performance in real time and has the authority to make improvements immediately
  • New hires get up to speed in weeks instead of months because knowledge is embedded in systems, not locked in people's heads
  • Training is protected through business cycles because leadership treats it like infrastructure, not overhead
  • Make-ready times keep dropping because workers have transparent feedback and systematic ways to share what works
  • Your workforce includes the full range of available talent because you've removed barriers that had nothing to do with ability
  • Problems get solved on the floor by the people closest to them, not escalated through three layers of management
  • Technology investments deliver their promised returns because people know how to use them effectively

This isn't fantasy. These are the results organizations achieve when they invest in human capital with the same discipline they apply to equipment purchases.

The Path Forward

Start where you are. You don't need perfect conditions or unlimited budgets. Pick one production line and implement real-time performance visibility. Provide systematic training for one critical skill where gaps are causing visible problems. Launch one Kaizen team focused on a persistent issue.

Measure the results. Track the same metrics before and after. Calculate the financial impact. Use those early wins to build the case for broader investment.

Protect training budgets through business cycles. Hold managers accountable for developing their teams, not just hitting production targets. Build peer coaching into daily operations. Create pathways for diverse talent to contribute and advance.

Treat your workforce like the infrastructure it is—not overhead to minimize, but a capability to develop systematically over time.

Why Now?

Your competitors can buy the same equipment you have. They can't quickly replicate the workforce capability you build through sustained investment. That takes time, commitment, and cultural change that most organizations avoid.

The companies investing in human capital today will lead their industries in three to five years—not because they discovered secret techniques, but because they committed to fundamentals that everyone knows but few practice.

The future isn't waiting for us to catch up. It's already here, running in operations that made different choices. The only question is how long we'll wait before making those choices ourselves.

The transformation VistaPrint demonstrated twenty years ago is still waiting for the rest of the industry to embrace it. The tools are better now. The evidence is stronger. The workforce is ready.

What are we waiting for?

Jan Sierpe is a Print Media Technologist, G7® Expert, and Lean Manufacturing consultant with 35+ years of experience in packaging and commercial printing. He was part of the team that established VistaPrint's breakthrough Windsor facility in 2005, implementing the Lean strategies and operator training that enabled breakthrough performance. He has since trained 500+ press operators and continues to advocate for human capital investment and inclusive workforce development as the foundation of manufacturing excellence.

The complete white paper, "Human Capital and the Evolution of Productivity: How Inclusive Talent and Intelligent Systems Drive the Future of Manufacturing," is available upon request. Explores these themes in depth, with detailed case studies, economic analysis, and practical implementation strategies.

Add/View comments for this article →


Comments
user